胶片与数字的关系 | The Relationship Between Film and Digital
彭小莲

胶片与数字的关系

胶片是物质的,数字是虚拟的,从本质上说,这是两个不同系统构成的表达工具。所以我们可以从原理上来确定,那就是:一个是东西,一个不是东西!

胶片的成像,是利用视觉残留的原理,用一秒24格的胶片效果,最终让静止的画面运动起来,所以胶片是可以触摸并且长期保留。胶片的的成像,在目前的状态下,我的三〸年胶片拍摄经验,提示给我的是,胶片更接近我们的视觉感受,特别是它的透视关系。胶片,是工业时代的产物。

数字,是非常直接的获取,它具有格式化的曝光效果,所以它的成像结果是安全但缺少个性的。因为格式化曝光的准确性,在某种意义上,它会更加接近我们观感的需要。眼睛看见了什么,就可以获取什么。当眼睛在黑暗中瞳孔放大时,数字也会自动改变曝光指数。所以,数字的产生,让人类开始记录图像时变得更加普遍,图像也越来越能够模拟人的视觉感。

数字的诞生,就是将胶片 – 工业文明带来的技术的终结,它使得拍摄变得更加便捷和简单化。虽然他们同样是重塑视觉的图像,但是与胶片相比,数字不仅降低了成本,同时也简化了操作程序。由此,图像的表达,大大降低了制作的风险和投入的艰辛。

由于拍摄的简单,不需要严格的训练和控制,制作电影的普及并且低端化,从本质上带来的是电影质量的降低,更多粗制滥造的作品产生;但是这一定是一个过程,最终数字电影将渐渐进入有严格训练的系统化,它的质量和技术含量必然会得到提高,由此而改变数字电影的命运。

数字与胶片呈现的手段

因为胶片和数字是完全两个不同系统的产物,所以我们也完全可以在没有胶片技术的训练基础下,彻底用数字来思考成像和制作电影。数字的生存图像的原理,是与人眼睛的生存图像的原理更加接近和相同,所以数字摄影是具有仿生性的,在记录层面上,它的技术范围远远大于胶片,它的可能性也由此扩大,这是胶片永远不能跟它相比的。这不是我说的,这是一个非常基本的技术原理,在这点上,可以讨论的空间不仅是有限的,或者说根本就没有讨论空间可言。但是胶片的好处在于,它是物质性的,所以在呈现和保存上,胶片有自己的优势和特点。

我们可以从呈现上讲,数字化的呈现,它只对屏幕负责,是从反打光影来说的呈现,它对屏幕是直接性的,它不需要通过任何物质的媒介转换,首先它就不需要以胶片的手段替代,它的光影是从你拍摄时看见,到最后大屏幕的呈现,中景没有过程,更不需要寻找替代物。

这样就证明了,胶片和数字文件的图像呈现过程,是没有任何可比性的。

胶片到图像呈现是有中间过程的,这正是胶片发展的瓶颈。但是为什么有那么多大导演还是怀念胶片?那是因为胶片所产生的非常微妙的特质,目前的数字技术还没有达到它的境界。事实表明,这只是个时间问题,数字摄影正在不断变化,提高!

从我坚持拍胶片,到最后转换成拍数字电影,这是一个时代的变化,个人的力量很难与它抗争。

胶片与数字色彩的区别

从色彩学的研究上,英国人在1863年就取得了研究成果,发现了我们眼睛看出来的原理,色彩由红绿蓝三个元色构成,也就是数码相机的呈现原理,而红绿蓝,也是人眼睛里感色的三种细胞。这三种感色细胞,通过眼睛扫摹,由光刺激眼睛后产生的生物电,最后传入大脑,在大脑里面形成图像。(这是一个医学博士向我阐述的关于色彩进入人体反应的基本原理)。这个原理,也证实了数码相机的sim和ccd的感光原件,它们正是根据这个原理,将无数个小的感光原件 – 也就是它的功能,只要能收入到光影,它就能产生非常微弱的电能,然后由它转换成数字,根据数字的大小形成数字文件,而数码相机上sim就是红绿蓝三个感色原件,这样就形成无数的像数点,最后由这些像数点形成图像,这个图像是和眼睛看到色彩的原理是一模一样的。从这个原理上讲,从光能转成电能的时候,数字就在某种程度上具有了一种无限性,它的范围变得宽泛,更接近人眼。

从而证实的是胶片的不同,尽管胶片也是利用了光能的原理,但是它的光能是通过银、盐构成的影像。由于银、盐的关系,感过光的地方,银就会变黑,没有感光的地方,通过显影定影处理,把没有银的地方去掉,就是白色的,这就是胶片的形成,也是我们通常说的”冲洗出来的负片”,也叫叫底片。

而数字正好是相反的,有光进来首先是以黑和白来区别图像的边界和呈现,它完全是物质性的,所以胶片颜色从理论上讲,它是红黄蓝的概念,(柯达胶片的成功,就是他们第一个解决了胶片里面黄颜色的效果,柯达真实地还原了黄色的效果,所以他们招牌标志性颜色,就是黄色)但是,数字的原色是红绿蓝。胶片和数字,这两种颜色正好是一种补色关系,一种是物质性的,一种是光线性的,本质上它们是一种对应关系。

所以,胶片是先有负片的产生(底片),然后冲洗出正片(样片、完成片),通过放映机的投射,最后在银幕呈现出图像。它生产的过程是复杂且精致的。

在此只是告诉大家胶片和数字的区别,目的是为了更好地掌握数字的处理和控制好它的功能,不要把影片拍摄得粗制滥造。

2018/3/12 于香港科大

Peng Xiaolian

The Relationship Between Film and Digital

Film is material, digital is virtual. Essentially, these are expressive tools composed of two different systems. So we can determine from principle that: one is a thing, the other is not a thing!

Film imaging utilizes the principle of visual persistence, using 24 frames per second to ultimately make static images move. So film can be touched and preserved long-term. Regarding film imaging, in the current state, my thirty years of film shooting experience suggests that film is closer to our visual perception, especially its perspective relationships. Film is a product of the industrial age.

Digital acquisition is very direct, with formatted exposure effects, so its imaging results are safe but lack personality. Because of the accuracy of formatted exposure, in some sense it becomes closer to our perceptual needs. What the eye sees can be captured. When the eye’s pupil dilates in darkness, digital also automatically changes the exposure index. So the emergence of digital has made human image recording more universal, and images have become increasingly able to simulate human vision.

The birth of digital marked the end of film – the technology brought by industrial civilization. It made shooting more convenient and simplified. Although they are both images that reshape vision, compared to film, digital not only reduced costs but also simplified operational procedures. Thus, image expression greatly reduced production risks and input hardships.

Due to the simplicity of shooting, not requiring strict training and control, filmmaking has become popularized and low-end, essentially bringing about a decline in film quality and the production of more crude works. But this is certainly a process – eventually digital cinema will gradually enter systematized strict training, and its quality and technical content will inevitably improve, thereby changing the fate of digital cinema.

Presentation Methods of Digital and Film

Because film and digital are products of completely different systems, we can also completely use digital thinking for imaging and filmmaking without a foundation in film technology training. The principle of digital image survival is closer to and more similar to the principle of human eye image survival, so digital photography is biomimetic. At the recording level, its technical range far exceeds film, and its possibilities are thereby expanded – this is something film can never compare to. This is not what I’m saying; this is a very basic technical principle. On this point, the space for discussion is not only limited, or rather there is no discussion space at all. But the advantage of film is that it is material, so in presentation and preservation, film has its own advantages and characteristics.

We can speak from the presentation aspect: digital presentation is only responsible to the screen, speaking from reverse lighting and shadow presentation. It is direct to the screen, requiring no material medium conversion. First, it doesn’t need to substitute with film methods. Its light and shadow goes from what you see when shooting to the final big screen presentation – there’s no middle process, and no need to find substitutes.

This proves that the image presentation processes of film and digital files have no comparability whatsoever.

Film to image presentation has intermediate processes, which is precisely the bottleneck of film development. But why do so many great directors still miss film? That’s because of the very subtle qualities that film produces, which current digital technology has not yet reached. Facts show this is only a matter of time – digital photography is constantly changing and improving!

From my persistence in shooting film to finally converting to shooting digital cinema, this is a change of era. Individual strength can hardly contend with it.

The Difference Between Film and Digital Color

From color science research, the British achieved research results in 1863, discovering the principle of how our eyes see. Color is composed of three primary colors: red, green, and blue – which is also the presentation principle of digital cameras. Red, green, and blue are also the three types of color-sensing cells in human eyes. These three color-sensing cells, through eye scanning, generate bioelectricity when stimulated by light, which is finally transmitted to the brain and forms images in the brain. (This is the basic principle of color entering the human body’s reaction as explained to me by a medical doctor.) This principle also confirms that the CIM and CCD photosensitive components of digital cameras are based on this principle, converting countless small photosensitive components – that is, their function is that as long as they can receive light and shadow, they can produce very weak electrical energy, then convert it to digital. Based on the size of the digital signal, digital files are formed. The CIM on digital cameras has red, green, and blue color-sensing components, forming countless pixel points, and finally these pixel points form images. This image formation is exactly the same as the principle of how eyes see color. From this principle, when light energy converts to electrical energy, digital possesses a kind of infinity to some degree – its range becomes broad, closer to human eyes.

This confirms the difference of film. Although film also utilizes the principle of light energy, its light energy creates images through silver and salt. Due to the silver-salt relationship, places exposed to light cause silver to turn black, while unexposed places, through development and fixing processes, remove areas without silver, leaving white – this is film formation, also what we commonly call “developed negatives” or base film.

Digital is exactly the opposite. When light enters, it first distinguishes image boundaries and presentation through black and white. It is completely material, so film color theoretically follows the red-yellow-blue concept. (Kodak’s success was that they were the first to solve the yellow color effect in film. Kodak truly restored the yellow effect, so their signature trademark color is yellow.) But digital’s primary colors are red-green-blue. Film and digital – these two color systems are exactly in a complementary relationship: one is material, one is light-based. Essentially they are in a corresponding relationship.

So film first produces negatives (base film), then develops positives (sample film, finished film), and through projector projection, finally presents images on the screen. Its production process is complex and refined.

This is only to tell everyone the difference between film and digital, with the purpose of better mastering digital processing and controlling its functions well, so as not to shoot films in a crude and shoddy manner.

2018/3/12 at HKUST