如何做纪录片的采访 | How to Interview for Documentaries

如何做纪录片的采访 | How to Interview for Documentaries

彭小莲

纪录片的采访不仅仅是一个提问的行为,更不是到了现场,看见采访对象的时候,你真的提问,等待着对方的回复,如果这样的话,对方是没有什么话好说的。记得有一次在纽约,一个”侨报”者问谢飞老师,你主要拍过什么电影?谢飞回头对我说,她怎么什么都不知道,我能说什么?记者不好意思说,我不是跑影视的。谢飞老师说,那就算了。

纪录片的采访,要求你在采访之前必须做大量的功课,把对方事情、作品都摸清楚,列好问题,才能出门。这还不够,你必须对他的问题里面的细节有特别的关注,上去不是去提问的,是拉近他对你的信任度,让他知道你确实理解他,对他有跟别人不一样的认识角度。不然,你觉得提了一个有趣的问题,其实很多人都问过,你再问,他要么没兴趣回答,要么就会敷衍你,但是你的提问必须让对方产生热情,这样你才可能得到你意想不到的回答和内容。

让我记忆犹新的是采访捷克大导演,伊利·门泽尔。2013年他作为上海国际电影节的评委被邀请参加,我联系到他的秘书,他答应接受一个简短的采访。大师很内向也是非常骄傲,他低着眼睛走进屋子。他坐下,拿着一只笔,心不在焉地敲打着桌子,我问了他影片里的两个问题,他都是看着桌面回答的,显然这些问题对他都不新鲜。然后我问,你们捷克导演很有钱,他摇了摇头,但是我说,看见你在布拉格的房子好大,里面那么多书,像一个图书馆。他一下抬起眼睛看着我问:你怎么知道的?我说,是你自拍的一小段视频放在盗版碟后面的嘛。他顿时就产生了兴趣说,这是我表哥去世后留给了我的钱买的。他有点钱。

对于一个东欧艺术家,你一说”地下” “盗版”他们就会产生兴趣,因为在解体之前,他们都是通过这样的渠道来了解世界,他们把这叫成”Samizdat”,这是源于俄语,意思是”未经许可的出版物”,景凯旋把它译为”萨米亚特”。其实说的这些东西最终都不会放进采访,关键是采访对象对你有了新的认识,调动了他的积极性,他感觉到你的价值观是和他一致的,你对于他门的文化不仅是尊重并且是了解和热爱的,这才是关键!

在这之后,就不是我提问题,而是门泽尔自己给我们讲了很故事,特别是他们捷克人的幽默,让我们捧腹大笑。他讲到赫拉巴尔去世后,把他著作的拍摄版权都给了门泽尔,他特别想怕《我曾经伺候过英国国王》,但是没有人投资,在政治上太危险了。解体以后,他继续找投资,同样没有投资,人家会问:这样的电影卖座吗?然后,他的制片人背着他,把版权卖给了电视台。即使在那么小的捷克,门泽尔也找不到这个制片人。九年以后,他又是作为评委参加国际电影节,突然看见这个制片带着他的新片上台与观众见面,门泽尔立刻问人借了一个手杖,全然不顾自己大导演的身份,大步走上台,举起手杖劈头朝制片打去,全场哗然,这就是当年著名的”伊利事件”。

那时候偶尔可以打开Google,我只问了一个开头,后面的细节都是他说的。2007年,他终于找到钱,完成了影片,2008年成为奥斯卡最佳外语片提名,也是那一年捷克持续半年的票房第一的影片。两小时的采访结束,远远超出大家的想象,最后我们从书包里拿出一大摞他的盗版碟让他签字,他兴致很高,还要找碟片上白色的地方签字,以免看不清楚。

这是一次受益匪浅的采访!因为热爱!

Peng Xiaolian

Documentary interviews are not merely an act of asking questions, nor are they about going to the scene, seeing the interview subject, and then actually asking questions and waiting for their response – if that were the case, the other party would have nothing much to say. I remember once in New York, a reporter from “Qiao Bao” asked Teacher Xie Fei, “What films have you mainly directed?” Xie Fei turned to me and said, “How can she know nothing at all? What can I say?” The reporter embarrassedly said, “I don’t usually cover film and television.” Teacher Xie Fei said, “Then forget it.”

Documentary interviews require you to do extensive homework before the interview, thoroughly understanding the other party’s affairs and works, listing questions, before you can go out. This is still not enough – you must pay special attention to the details within his issues. You don’t go there to ask questions, but to build his trust in you, letting him know that you truly understand him and have a different perspective on him than others. Otherwise, you think you’ve asked an interesting question, but actually many people have asked it before. When you ask again, he either has no interest in answering or will brush you off. But your questions must generate enthusiasm in the other party, so that you can possibly get unexpected answers and content.

What remains vivid in my memory is interviewing the great Czech director, Jiří Menzel. In 2013, he was invited to participate as a jury member of the Shanghai International Film Festival. I contacted his secretary, and he agreed to accept a brief interview. The master was very introverted and also very proud – he walked into the room with his eyes lowered. He sat down, holding a pen, absentmindedly tapping it on the table. I asked him two questions about his films, and he answered while looking at the table surface – clearly these questions were not new to him. Then I asked, “You Czech directors are very wealthy.” He shook his head, but I said, “I saw your house in Prague is so big, with so many books inside, like a library.” He immediately raised his eyes to look at me and asked, “How do you know?” I said, “It’s from a short video you filmed yourself on the back of a pirated disc.” He immediately became interested and said, “This was bought with money my cousin left me after he died. He had some money.”

For an Eastern European artist, once you mention “underground” or “piracy,” they become interested, because before the dissolution, they all understood the world through such channels. They call this “Samizdat,” which comes from Russian, meaning “unauthorized publications.” Jing Kaixuan translated it as “Samiyate.” Actually, none of these things would ultimately be included in the interview – the key is that the interview subject has gained a new understanding of you, mobilizing his enthusiasm. He feels that your values are consistent with his, that you not only respect their culture but also understand and love it – this is the key!

After this, it wasn’t me asking questions, but Menzel himself telling us many stories, especially about Czech humor, which made us laugh heartily. He talked about how after Hrabal died, he gave all the film rights to his works to Menzel. He particularly wanted to film “I Served the King of England,” but no one would invest – it was too politically dangerous. After the dissolution, he continued looking for investment, but still no investment. People would ask: “Would such a film be box office hits?” Then, his producer secretly sold the rights to a television station behind his back. Even in such a small country as Czech Republic, Menzel couldn’t find this producer. Nine years later, he was again participating as a jury member in an international film festival when he suddenly saw this producer bringing his new film on stage to meet the audience. Menzel immediately asked to borrow a walking stick, completely disregarding his status as a great director, strode onto the stage, raised the stick and struck the producer on the head. The entire audience was in uproar – this was the famous “Jiří Incident” of that year.

At that time, I could occasionally access Google. I only asked one opening question, and he told all the subsequent details himself. In 2007, he finally found the money and completed the film. In 2008, it became an Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Language Film, and was also the number one box office film in Czech Republic for half a year that year. The two-hour interview ended, far exceeding everyone’s imagination. Finally, we took out a large stack of his pirated discs from our bags for him to sign. He was in high spirits and insisted on finding white spaces on the discs to sign, so the signatures would be clearly visible.

This was a tremendously beneficial interview! Because of love!